Sections 302 (b), 324 and 449 of the conviction, seeking respect for the murder, appreciating the evidence from the domestic plea. Eyewitnesses, including the injured witness, made unanimous statements, with the complainant and other eye witnesses on the key dimensions of the case. Their presence at the time and place of the incident has made it abundantly clear that the injured female witness had conducted a substantial amount of litigation regarding the suspect's involvement in the commission of the crime, which is already being used by prosecution witnesses. Was known, in the light of which it was identified. Prior to the lantern investigating officer, the non-production of lanterns did not erase the apparent value of the prosecution's testimony about the ocular testimony and the failure of the investigating officer to disclose the distance between the suspect and the defendant at the time of the incident. I was unsuccessful. The plan was not fatal to the prosecution case, otherwise it was established through credible evidence from the forensic science laboratory report that substantially aided the prosecution in the recovery of weapons and crime sites that cooperated. The tort was tried, the prosecution's witness relationship with the victim was of no consequence, because the defense party, in cross-examination, did not suggest. The case may be false defects, instability, weakness or failure to prove motive by prosecution, not to impose a general sentence of death or to lower the death penalty to a lesser degree, especially when the prosecution case is completely Credible and confident that the evidence was on record. No mitigating circumstances were available in favor of the accused and the accused in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
