MUHAMMAD YOUNUS REHMAN versus GHULAM MUSTAFA
A. XXXVII, the suite for collection of pro-note money, the pro-note and the process under which it was claimed, was substantiated by confirming the testimony of the documents, both said that the witnesses Stated that the pro note and receipt, the defendant had hanged in his presence, the alleged contradiction with regard to the determination of the stamps of income tax stated by the defendant was not a serious trial court, in the circumstances of the case. In the absence of reading any false statement or evidence through the hearing, the address of the trial court, in the first regular appeal, will be referred to the appellate court. It was confirmed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Kandiaro lawyer