MUHAMMAD PERVAIZ versus STATE
The testimony of Articles 302 and 324 of the evidence was Dece was the brother of the deceased complainant and the injured prosecution witness was the son of the deceased doctor who conducted the post-mortem examination of the deceased, he had 2/3 hours between injury and death and death and post. The deadline was given within 24 hours of the autopsy, which raised doubts about the prosecution's history and the date of the incident, that the complainant's son was also injured, but the prosecutor was required to file his medico legal report. I was unsuccessful, the doctor who performed the post-mortem examination found that the bandage had been removed at the time of the post-mortem examination. Tofi was injured and the victim received a large number of injections, but the prosecutor failed to say where the bandages were applied and who was the person who applied the injections that occurred during the year. Was. In 1998, the trial was conducted in the year 2000, but until 2005, the legal report of Meduco, who was injured by the complainant's son, did not come to light through the complainant. Police recovered four criminal offenses, the firearms expert said. The suspect's licensed pistol was also taken into custody and sent to the Firearms Expert, but prosecuted with the intent and unlawful purposes of the defendant. Do not submit this report The prosecution officer never disclosed that the investigating officer's motive behind the incident was that the victim had received a stay order against the accused, but no copy of any civil suit or any restraining order. The trial court prosecution was not presented by. Defendant by trial court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Mehrab Pur lawyer