MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KABIRWALA
Sections 8 and 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The applicant for the re-hearing of the constitutional petition requested the re-hearing of the constitutional petition decided by the High Court in the background of realism filed by the appellate court. I had dismissed the civil review filed against the order passed. Under section 9 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, because the amendment in this case was placed solely on the petitioner's High Court plate, the review was not fully before the Appellate Court or even before the High Court because at that time When there is specific relief, section 9 of the Act, 1877, the Code of Conduct, 1908, was not present and no amending power was available to any court and since section 8 of the Special Relief Act, 1877 was The alternative provided for by the prosecution was provided. In accordance with the said Act, the availability of such procurement will hinder the exercise of the amended jurisdiction. The Code of Civil Procedure was formed in 1877 and the Code of Civil Procedure was introduced in 1859 and the Code of Civil Procedure, 1877 came into force, followed by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1882, and finally the present Code of Civil Procedure in 1908. Brought to The Rule was amended in 1859, 1861, to give amendment powers to Section 35, which were enacted in 1877, and finally amended to 1879 in 1879, when the conditions were specifically for the Relief Act, Contains 1877. Section 9 was enforced, so the applicants' dispute was without basis. Section 115, CPC had to comply with its terms, once section 115
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
