MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus CITIBANK N.A. THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER (LITIGATION)
Section 9 Application for leave to defend bank debt collection suit Limitation press publication for leave to defend suit was dismissed by the Banking Court after a period of time and in favor of the Bank Play taken by the plaintiff The trial was ordered. Knowing the publication of Simmons in the press, he immediately filed an application. The bank was told that such a request was filed after 21 days, so the request was timely restricted, as required by law, on 8 6 2001, or a maximum of 18 6 On 2001, when the summons was published in the newspapers and thus it was required to file a leave application to defend the case within 21 days from 6 6 2001, while it filed a leave application on 20 9 2001 Therefore, the Banking Court did not commit any illegal acts while the matter was banned while it was stated that the trial court had asked for the trial. The request for sour was banned and no petition for condolence was delayed. Ed, therefore, the same dismissal decision passed by the Banking Court did not face any illegal interference and no interference was sought by the High Court, the appeal was dismissed in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
