Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAHID versus ABDUL LATEEF

Sections 497 (5) of the Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Sections 10 (2) and 8 bail cancellations, the FIR affirming the request for dismissal of the accused with a delay of ten days To find out the facts about the disclosure of the names of any witnesses such as the adulteration of section 88 crime (enforcement hood), ordinance, 1979 1979 1979 or Which can support the complainant's argument that the adultery was actually cited during the investigation conducted by only two witnesses who acted as counsel for the seized bed sheet recovered , Which reported the transfer was waiting at the scene, implementation of adultery (implemented alhud) Ordinance 1979, the provisions of Section 10 (2) did not attract his / her facts. For the reasons in the FIR that the video film, which was provided with a copy of the High Court, did not include any act of the accused, as well as the accompanying accused which can be appreciated as Zina presented the challan. The trial court and the case was going on. In such a case, the request for the cancellation of the bail granted to the accused by the trial court, cannot be dismissed on the three grounds mentioned in section 497 (5), CR PC. (i) If the accused misuses the freedom of guarantee. (ii) if the accused has committed the same offense while on bail. (iii) if the accused attempted to tamper with the evidence brought to the record during the investigation, the trial of the bail granted by the trial court or by the applicant applicant / complainant Was not charged with failing to do so. , Attachments Pakistan, top advocate family court from Jalozai lawyer