Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION THROUGH INCHARGE LAW DEPARTMENT versus NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

Section 49 (4 & E) and 63 Service Tribunal Act (LXX of 1973), Section 2A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Jurisdiction of unfair labor practice by the National Industrial Relations Commission Scope Petitioner Which was owned by a company and controlled by the Federal Ministry of Industry and Production, the National Industrial Relations Commission questioned the status quo issued by the quorum non-judge, in the eyes of the law without bad, outlawed and without legal authority. The National Industrial Relations Commission may have jurisdiction. When the application can be proved from the charge sheet or from any other aspect of another record, it can be proved that the alleged action under the definition of unfair labor as defined under Section 63 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2002, There is no charge on the charge sheet. The employee was satisfied with the time frame set out in section 63 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002, in the presence of discharge of court / tribunal jurisdiction by the National Industrial Relations Commission, in the absence of unfair labor practice. In addition to the service tribunal under 2A, it should be used illegally and was intended for national industrialization. The Relations Commission will first address the issue of jurisdiction and then, as the High Court, will pass the decision that the constitutional petition was appointed as a proportional order of approval approved by the National Industrial Relations Commission and earlier The hearing said the commission was declared an applicant without illegal and legal authority. Work with pending inquiries against employees strictly in accordance with employer law list of advocates from Jaja Abasian lawyer