Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RAUF versus MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ TANERIES

Section 25A & 65B Limitation Act (IX of 1908), section 5 Complaint against termination of service barring non-submission of complaint notice within a period of three months, respite of employees for good cause which was suspended from employment There was a need for service. Employers have been given notice of complaint within three months due to the proceedings, but stated that employees were given notices after the expiration of the fixed-term complaint notice, in which case, the ban was imposed They may also be delayed under section 5 of the Prison Act, 1908. The Industrial Relations Ordinance was implemented under section 65B of 1969, but delays can only be repented for reasons. There was no evidence provided by the employees that they had sent a notice of complaint to the factory gate within a period of three months; their own statements, to the employees, were required by law to provide a reason for the condolences. The delay would have meant a lot of purpose, a situation beyond party control, but the reason for the delay by the employees was not enough to justify the reason for filing a complaint before the Labor Court. ? One of the conditions was to serve a notice of complaint to employers because under Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, employees were not given a timely complaint notice, nor did the employee apologize for the delay in sending the complaint notice. Reason was not submitted, the complaint filed by him before the Labor Court was not dismissed, the Labor Court rightly rejected, saying that industrial relations Ardenan immigration advocates email from Renala Khurd lawyer