Find a Lawyer

MST. DURDANA versus STATE

Section 302 (b) / 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 361 and 341 were unable to understand the language of evidence The reference to the High Court's affirmative language in which the prosecution's witnesses testified in the trial court was not It is understood by the accused that the two accused did not understand any language other than Persian, and because the third accused was deaf and dumb, he could understand only the signs and gestures, thus, in open court the accused in Persian language. Should be interpreted, the deaf and dumb accused's relatives could explain the action through a spokesperson. Such an attempt by the trial court's accused could not consciously and properly defend itself, Section 361, CRPC, an essential section, was clearly violated. References made by the trial court and under section 111, CRPC were not guaranteed and the conviction of the convicted accused was set aside. The case was sent to the trial court with the necessary instructions so that it could be processed in accordance with the law and the same decision was decided on the merit. online advocate from Loralai lawyer