Find a Lawyer

SALEH MUHAMAMD versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Testimony Definition Benefits of Doubts The version of the testimony of two prosecutors, who was the victim's brother, did not support independent evidence; the main attack on the ocular testimony of the two witnesses was that they were present and present. The said witnesses could not be relied on as witnesses because they were the witnesses, the relationship of the witnesses with the accused or the close association, absence of hostility, harassment or libel against the accused under any other purpose. It won't be enough for this. Be interesting witnesses and his testimony will not be dismissed in this way, but in the present case, the eyewitnesses could not prove their presence on the occasion at the relevant time, the investigation of the said witnesses revealed that the ocular. The testimony is very skeptical and relying on such evidence was extremely unsafe and it was not safe to rely solely on the oral statements of the witnesses' statements. According to the defendant's conviction statement in the case of widespread accusations, the witnesses were serious victims and were not trusted; no independent and unwanted witnesses from the area were presented to confirm the version of the prosecution. The medical evidence, to the extent that litigation support firearms due to the nature of the evidence of his life and medical evidence beyond verification, cannot be considered contradictory evidence. No other sufficiently certified evidence was on record nor any evidence to support it It was done. An explanation of the error is forthcoming from the investigating officer where on record online advocate from Kot Bunglow lawyer