Find a Lawyer

MAQBOOL SHAH versus STATE

Sections 302, 324, 427, 148 and 149 of the testimonial testimony report, which was made on the spot only after the initial investigation, were dismissed as such reports were viewed with suspicion by the courts. Yes, one of the prosecution's witnesses was nearby. There were witnesses related to the complainant and thus of interest and in such a case, in order for the accused to be convicted, some confrontation was required from an independent or credible source, but in this case the prosecution's witness was somewhat non-existent. The witnesses appeared to be biased, lacking. Supported the prosecution's case, which said in cross-examination that it had neither identified the suspect nor had any address. Not only was the material contradictory to the ocular version presented by eye witnesses and the medical evidence on record, it has also improved substantially. The trial court failed to present the witness's account against the version given in the FIR prosecution without any reasonable doubt that the trial court accepted the appeal against the trial court's decision. He was acquitted of his charges and released from jail. immigration advocate from Lala rukh lawyer