Find a Lawyer

NAIMAT KHAN versus HAMZULLAH KHAN

Section 115 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Articles 8, 42 and 54 of the Amendment jurisdiction scope suit, which was passed by the restraining courts in the possession, declaration and permanent injunction, is subject to uncertainty, legality, facts and circumstances of the case. And they did not demand. The High Court may not interfere with the jurisdiction of the Magistrate's jurisdiction over the facts or questions relating to the law, unless these findings have resulted in a judicial defect, illegal or material misconduct, The decisions were not arbitrary or hypothetical and did not meet them all. The applicant's claim under the claim was on oral procurement which resulted in a heavy ban on the facts of the purchase; the applicants disclosed the requirements for justice based on the guns known to these applicants. Was not done Applicants, but they failed to exclude them by providing solid and credible evidence, the evidence presented by the applicants was irrevocable and irrevocable; only the plaintiffs' claims regarding oral sales, Without any positive effort on their part to confirm it, there was no result. advocate for immigration from Sajawal lawyer