Find a Lawyer

MST. CHAMAN SHEREEN versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. THROUGH SECRETARY HOME, N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR

Section 3 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application FI Rupees Prevention Copies indicated that there was a personal and individual case against the sons of the applicants in which the petitioner and his opponents. One or more sons, but not the public at large, did not mention how the public was in danger from the occurrence of these events, which were of a normal nature and how it was said that public order The cases of prejudice handling are prejudicial: The main responsibility of police officers at a local police station is to retain the public. Orders of the usual order are investigated by the staff who have submitted cases for judicial decision in the courts. Restoring law and order was the duty of an executive / administrative branch of a local police and as long as there was no danger to the peace. Local society was born in peace, it cannot be said that public order cannot be maintained properly. A short period of time due to a criminal incident, but with such a slight sensation, the event itself will not be of public importance and will not change the personal character of the incident, unless such crime is peaceful throughout society. There was no danger of peace, it was never just to be in FI. The accused is considered to be the proof of the crime, it is said that the cases involved have to go through a judicial inquiry and it was on the basis of the facts and the law involved in each case that an accused was either convicted or acquitted. Gone, but the usual cases would not result in such an FI top advocate from Naukundi lawyer