Find a Lawyer

AURANGZEB versus PUBLIC AT LARGE

Section 2 (1) (m), 32, 33 and 46 application for appointment of guardian, dismissed appeal against the order of the District Judge under which the application for appointment of guardian of the appellant's brother was rejected. When he was mentally ill and physically paralyzed when he was in a position to look after his property, litigation and other related matters, the appellant's brother's mental illness was brought before the District Judge Medical Superintendent DH. Q was sent to the hospital for the establishment of a medical board. The report doctor admitted that appellant's brother was mentally handicapped and that he had speech impairment and mental impairment as well as paralysis of the right side of his body and was unable to give any doctor's opinion. , However, concluded that the patient was not. In view of the opinion of the Medical Board in terms of section 2 (1) (m) of the Mental Health Ordinance, 2001, when mentally disabled, the results of the conclusions and the contents of the physician-related treatment contradicted themselves. Because the district judge could not decide on the basis of the verification of the matter, appeal was allowed, the case was directed to the district judge on remand. Judicial r provisions n \ r \ nDisplay the matter with the application of the independent judicial mind in accordance with the relevant law provisions. immigration advocates from Hunza Nagar lawyer