TAHIR SAEED EFFENDI versus CHAIRMAN, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN
Section 100 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Delay in filing Section 5 appeal was filed before the High Court giving the impression that a review petition against an unidentified order is competent and the revision request dismissed. In the event that the appeal was not filed, the appellant was awaiting the eviction request as the appellant had no explanation as to why the appeal was not made within a day or two after the copy of the unclean order was received. The Feedback filed by a person may not justify defamation of the wrong impression delay law. The limitation was very strict and the delayed condolences had to be explained every day, which would not allow failure, no reasonable explanation for not filing an appeal within the limitation period, especially the review Request for delay in filing an appeal after expulsion and request for contempt of appeal, were rejected on point
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer
