Find a Lawyer

MUNAWAR A. MALIK versus ABDUL SALAM

Clause (48 ()) and cancellation of old 80's and enforcement of new enforcement Transfer of cases affecting pending proceedings When cases were canceled in several constitutions, pending cases before the courts Delivery was not made. The new courts, formed under the new legislation, which are formed under the new law, will however take the jurisdiction of the aforesaid cases and make similar efforts in accordance with the law. The legislative scheme did not always provide any special provision for the transfer of all pending cases before the courts constituted under respected law. For the new courts established under the new law, but the intention of the legislature was to be examined in light of the new legislation, the intention of the legislature in this case was not that the industrial relations before the Labor Appellate Tribunal be canceled. Amendment requests remain pending under the Ordinance, 1969. Should be terminated, because it was in the knowledge of the legislature who reiterated that the provisional ordinance did not expire or automatically terminate if the temporary law expired. The temporary law was a period which expired or expired. In the case of such laws with or on the fulfillment of certain conditions was the common law. On the contrary, in the absence of special provisions, the actions taken under it will be terminated by the termination of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, due to non-provisional law. Will not expire, nor will it expire. Replaced by another permanent constitution, the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2002 famous supreme court advocate from Utror lawyer