DR. MUHAMMAD ARIF MAHMOOD BHATTI versus PROFESSOR SHABBIR AHMAD NASIR, CHAIRMAN, SPECIAL SELECTION BOARD
Article 199 Constitution Petitioner Appointment of Doctors Based on Contractor Applicants have been found to be disturbed by the appointment of defendants as Assistant Professors on the basis of contract under the recommendations of the Special Selection Board Petitioner as the private doctor was not made a member. had gone. He was much better on the board and more qualified and competent than the two eligible respondents, but in the interview process he was given maximum numbers and his qualifications were set at least even. The applicant belonged to a lower educational qualification and two respondents said they were equal, but said that the two respondents were far more experienced, the applicant could not be accused of allegedly manipulating the applicant interview. There were good steps to make the board a member, but a well-known private practitioner, J After the information was requested before joining the proceedings, I could not attend for some reasons lost, such misrepresentation, to establish your claim in relation to the appointment of the petitioner in the circumstances and prove your charges Failed to specify enough, its request was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Jaja Abasian lawyer