Find a Lawyer

QADEER SHAHBAZ versus DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER

Sections 152 (1) (c) and 157 of the Electoral Rules, 1974, Articles 9, 18 and 20 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petitioner and deputy Nazir of the applicant in the revised electoral rolls by the Assistant Inclusion of votes After the revision period ends, the Election Commissioner, but before the announcement of the election schedule, the papers returned by the Returning Officer were restored by the District Returning Officer. The validity petitioner filed an application on 18 6 2005, when no one had the slightest idea of publishing the election schedule. A 2005 order on such a request was approved in 25 2005, but such a vote was not entered in the electoral roll until 30 6 2005, according to the Assistant Election Commissioner, Not timely inclusion was due to the urgency and willingness of the task. The convenience of copying is that the fact that the applicant's vote had entered the bottom of the electoral roll would not be enough to doubt the truth / authenticity of it, especially when the fly is n Filed a separate form intended solely for newly added votes. Such an entry cannot be doubted in the present situation. The controversial question involved in such a case can be settled only after recording extensive evidence, which is not summarized in the constitutional proceedings. Can be In nature, the High Court dismissed the constitutional request for an election tribunal decision, if any election petition was filed. \ R \ n patent advocate from Dera Bugti lawyer