Find a Lawyer

SHARAFAT HAFEEZ GOREJA versus HABIB BANK LIMITED THROUGH PRESIDENT

Section 6 (2) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OIX, R 6 (a) (b) Two Defendants Overseas in the Bank of Tribunals Ordinance, 1984 under Section 6 (2) of the Suit for Debt Recovery Were. The processor server stated that the defendant had left the address on which another person resided in the report on the A / D registered by the postal authorities, that the trial court had left the addressing compound, after seeing the report mentioned above. Should have taken action against the report. O IX, R 6 (a), the defendants under CPC had issued a second summons to the ex-party or the defendants under O IX, R 6 (b), CPC, in the case of the former proceedings, the court had against the aforesaid person. The order of the case was to be issued. Under Section 6 (2) of the Ordinance Trial Court, the defendants did not pass any special order in respect of the failure to submit a reply to show cause notice and not to submit the reply on the showcase notice. ? The previous decision against the defendants approved by the court before recording the services rendered was not sustainable as the court must apply the appropriate provisions of the law, either party to the court's appeal in its appeal. If not brought to the side, keep it separate. The aforesaid court has received its remand for appropriate due process in response to the banking court's disqualification order and the tug defendants' notice to them. ask a advocate free from Ratto Dero lawyer