LAL MAST versus MUHAMMAD TARIQ
Section 2302 / evidence 34 The eyewitnesses, including the complainant, were in full support of each other in view of the value of the evidence The close relation of the four witnesses with the deceased had no basis for excluding their evidence as indicated. There was nothing to be done that they had no reason to falsely implicate. The case was not a matter of litigation in the presence of unwanted witnesses' trust, since the impressive evidence of the relevant witnesses could not have played a decisive role in the dismissal of Kalashnikov's crimes when witnesses directly The evidence was there. Neither denied, nor was the investigation suspected, medical evidence supported the prosecution version of the use of two different firearms of varying capability in the commission of the crime, after the suspected presence of the accused, the prosecution witnesses More validation was done in the ocular account offered by. The defense identified by the evidence was unbearable and could not be considered to create any suspicion but in the circumstances the conviction and punishment of the perpetrators were maintained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Mastoi lawyer