MUHAMMAD ZAFRAN versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. THROUGH SECRETARY, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, PESHAWAR
Article 199 Constitutional Application Principal Locus Punitancy Applicants at the Admission Medical College, who applied for admission to medical colleges on the basis of seats reserved for the children of Pakistanis abroad, submitted their applications along with the required documents. Had to do. The applicants who failed to file or submit the required documents in the stipulated time, were refused admission and the schedule given there was approved by the provincial government that no authority other than the provincial government was scheduled. Cannot go beyond and even at any stage, a person / authority has asked any candidate to fulfill the deficit as stated in the case of the applicants, such extension is given in the prospectus. Will be against the schedule and the prospectus will be against any concession where the prospectus has given this incomplete. Request was provided. If the form was subject to rejection, it will be taken as such and if any candidate did not submit the completed form, on or before the due date for submitting the application form, The application form was and should be taken as such. Locks was rejected as an incomplete principle of positivity that some authorities had accused the applicants of overcoming their shortcomings, not applying to the applicants' case, but instead to pre-empting it. Was against the benefit of the candidates, to delay the reduction of the principle of Luxury Poverty and apply it through the government.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Shangla lawyer