Find a Lawyer

FAZAL MAULA versus STATE

Testimony of Articles 2?2 (b) and ??9 of the testimony did not mention the names of the conspirators nor did they mention the names of the conspirators nor the names of the witnesses of such conspiracy, No proof of the circumstances, nor any evidence of the circumstances, which may have led to the conspiracy, was heard at the trial, the murder plot could not be pursued; There was nothing on record to prove the conspiracy and there were no circumstances that would exclude the possibility of the defendant's innocence. Evidence, either directly or indirectly, of any act or omission of any error was available on record to suggest a pre-concert between the accused or the accused in connection with the murder or a joint design In order to be convicted of murder, the circumstances must be evidence of a high value and degree and all circumstances should lead to crime and should not be fully consistent with any reasonable assumption that the cause of death is disclosed by medical evidence. And it can never identify the person who caused the fatal injury to a blood-stained clothing. This can only be proven by a report syrulujst same group were stained with human blood. Since the bodies of the suspects were removed from the body at the time of the post-mortem or blood was recovered from the place where the body was last found, which was recovered with the motor vehicle bullet mark, this would prove to be in the car. The hole was made. The evidence said the fireworks were not authentic / genuine, but the circumstances, which independently determined the person patent advocate from Jehlum lawyer