MUHAMMAD AMIN versus STATE
Sections 302 (b) and 392 offenses against property (enforcement hood) ordinance (VI 1979), section 20 recovery of a TT pistol, live bullets, empty, hat, sheet and shoe allegedly belonging to a defaulter Would not be the case. No basis for believing the crime was found in the accused's home, the recovery of blood-stained shoes and stones, the presence of gangs and the absence of evidence provided that the shoe, which was, in fact, the accused. It was alleged that the accused was involved in the crime. Klamyshnikov also did not receive a complaint, although he admitted that the accused was his neighbor and identified him at the time of the incident, but records in the FIR At the time of his arrival, he failed to disclose his name. In this case, the statement of the investigating officer is of great importance as the accused is the first complainant. It was not made for identification test as it was known.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Haripur lawyer
