Find a Lawyer

NAYYAR ABBAS versus STATE

Articles 10 (4) and 11 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), sections 337A (i), 459 and 506 of the testimonial evidence allegedly occurred in the home of the alleged victim's mother, the prosecutor's mother. Was on an acre. Was taken to the scene of the incident and allegedly sexually assaulted there and allegedly the victim was younger or older who was about 15/16 years old when the Lady Doctor It was seen very clearly that no signs of abuses were observed on the body. If the accused was intended to abduct the victim and for this purpose, according to the prosecution, they committed sexual immorality at home, they could easily remove the affected girl in the room or other part of the premises. Can do. In another room, the victim's mother tied the lock to move or drag the victim 10 to 12 acres away and, after passing through several village houses, did not appeal because of her abduction. During the incident, the alleged victim did not show any resistance as neither his clothes were torn nor any marks of elephant was found on his person. Victim did not take the alarm, this version of the victim's woman presented her version when the suspect was wearing shoes she went to the scene of the incident if she was forcefully abducted and according to her wishes. Was violated, then there was no chance of wearing his shoes, it cannot be ignored that the accused girl was convicted under Section 10 with the consent of the victim. )) The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979 197 how to become a advocate from Kakul lawyer