Find a Lawyer

ISHTIAQ AHMED SHEIKH AND OTHERS versus MESSRS UNITED BANK LIMITED

Article 212 (3) Appeal for termination of employment of bank employees The Supreme Court allowed employees to consider their submissions that no specific rules or regulations were either mentioned or relied upon. That could be said to have been infringed. That the documents which were incorporated by the employees in the charge sheet along with their responses and submitted to the service tribunal were appealed and their defense application was rejected and their case decided by a bank user. The bad credibility was based on the news. Although the employees were aware of the matter to all the top officials, they could not be punished nor could they be punished with the utmost punishment for dismissal because most of it was negligence or corruption. The allegations were properly acknowledged for arguments with no confession top civil advocates from Nankana Sahib lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes