Find a Lawyer

ZAHID IMRAN versus STATE

Sections 302/149; 148 and 316 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), the ocular versions given by Section 7 eye witnesses were consistent and straightforward, providing medical evidence, motivation, recovery of crime weapons, iron fist, Dundas. And were ready with the help of the Sutas. And the accused had described his visit on the occasion of the fateful presence of witnesses and the arrest of the three accused in the place of crime had completely established his presence there, also the reasons for naming the accused in the FIR. Explained, the prosecution's witnesses had no motive, or the question of illicit plea and false interference against the accused was not raised. The four identified witnesses of the accused were able to prove the prosecution at trial. And the affidavit was rightly upheld by the trial court, which sentenced the accused. Under Section 302 (b), PPC and Section 7A of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, while the High Court had convicted the culprits under section 161616 on the charge of abolishing the crime of retaining them, P. Under the PCC, the courts disagreed with regard to the penalties and applicable provisions under the provisions of section 16 and in. The PPC could not be applied in this case and the precedent is of no importance. Attached to Section 151515, the PPC was overlooked by the High Court, which is an essential and integral part of this section and it may seek assistance in interpreting the intention of the Legislature while the Section Court302, the PC, the PC 1616 Section, The High Court erred in changing the PPC. By ignoring the evidence on record pakistani advocates Badin lawyer