Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus STATE

Sections 302 (b) and 449 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) were presented by the prisoners of the home, the most natural witnesses, and their testimony. Is free. The malicious truth and confidence were impressive, as evidenced by the medical evidence, and the accused's confession led to the murder of four of his family members, with special pleas of guilt and sudden provocation and family honor, but as such Neither did the defendant support the evidence on the record, nor did the defendants establish the same by presenting any evidence; the record did not involve the murder of an accused before any untoward incident took place. Did not persuade, the defense version, although based on fact, was in the mind of the accused against his sister and other members of the family The hatred will be the trigger of the incident and not the source of unhappiness and serious provocation. The act of cruelty not only killed her sister for bad character, but also for her real mother and two brothers. Killed on false claims and provocation for the honor of the family was neither sudden nor grave, but because of the conduct of his sister, he made misconduct in his mind against the family members and without any justification. The four persons had committed Kadal Amad and did not deserve any relaxation in the case but were allowed to appeal. Damn I suspect refused inheritance advocates near Sanjwal lawyer