Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IDRIS KHAN versus SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, ISLAMABAD

Section 3 Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 2 (b) Government Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1973, R2 (4) Act relating to mismanagement department, employees were dismissed Without formal inquiry into the allegation of writing to the Minister, accusing him of corruption and misappropriation of government funds by designated officers, the appeal against the dismissal of public servants was submitted by the public servant, who had to write the letter. There was no action for mismanagement of the Minister. The letter sent by the civil servant was not valid and despite the accuracy of the allegations contained in it, it was a misdemeanor process that could not be approved and not tolerated. Was because the civil servant was not treated fairly because he was awarded the honorable award. Exemption Sentencing Without Proper Inquiry Except under special circumstances, a civil servant should not be subject to any unusual demand for a fine-grabbing dismissal without proper inquiry and a reasonable opportunity to explain his position. If circumstances do not exist, summary proceedings, and without inquiry, will suggest an element of prejudice and unfair treatment on major penalties for dismissal. In terms of the amount of punishment, the Supreme Court changed the leave application to appeal the appeal and changed the dismissal sentence to censorship in the slightest fine and instructed the authorities to provide the government employee with all Restore employment with greater benefits. law firms from Garh Maharaja lawyer