Find a Lawyer

MST. SAIMA IRUM versus TARIQ JAVED

Section 5, Schedule, Sections 9 and 10 [as amended by the Family Courts (Amendment) Ordinance (LV of 2002)] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application to terminate marriage on the basis of marriage and otherwise if the husband The cruel attitude forced his wife to search for the skull, and he was left behind with the intention of taking back the property he had given to his wife, in which case he would not be entitled to rehabilitate her. Yes, but if the wife's behavior was not good with her husband, and she was reluctant to pay for her marital obligations, In this case, the husband would be entitled to the restoration of the defective family court, in the present case without dissolving the marriage between the parties without stating that the marriage was being dissolved. On the basis of the Khalla or otherwise the wife's plaintiff has disclosed that she had not asked Khulla for divorce at all, but had just sought divorce on the basis of cruelty; Desert / separation for more than a year and a half, and failure of the husband to perform his marital obligations for no good reason, in family court situations, between spouses in pre-trial counsel The marriage was properly dissolved. The provisions of section 10 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, but on the point of restitution of the dubious property were wrong, because neither the case proceeded to the decision of the husband for the right to restore the seal, nor Denver's release will be useless. But it was opened by the Family Court property advocates from Kalaswala lawyer