Section 561A, 497 and 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 420, 468 and 471 of the Corruption Prevention Act (Second of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the prosecutor / accused against whom FIR was filed under 420. 468 and 471, the PPC referred to the trial court for his post-arrest warrant. But the trial court not only rejected the bail application, but also directed the local police to include section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act against the applicant and refer the matter to the relevant authorities. ? The local police concerned did not have options. Filing a lawsuit against a applicant for public functions performed with the ability of a public servant can only register any case against the Anti-Corruption Establishment Government officials, registering a case against the applicant through local police, Not only was it illegal and illegal in the circumstances, but also without any jurisdiction where a particular task was required to be done in a particular way, whether it should be done in a trial or not in all the trial court Was occupied, it should have restricted its authority to section 497/498, The trial court, by way of the ERPC directive, showed most of the trial court's orders in its jurisdiction to register the case against the applicant. It was passed on to lawful authority without legal influence and it was abolished
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
