JAVAID AKHTAR CHEEMA versus DIRECTORATE OF FLORICULTURE (TRAINING AND RESEARCH), PUNJAB, LAHOER
Article 212 (3) was amended to accommodate employees in the new Directorate when the Directorate of Floriculture and the Directorate of Horticulture Research Institute for Floriculture and Landscaping were merged and the new Directorate of Florida Culture was given training and training. Who was employed as an agricultural officer. In pursuance of the policy of adjusting employees in the new directorate, their adjustment was chosen, but was not considered because of the requisite educational qualifications filed by applicants before the service tribunal was dismissed. They did not have the required educational qualifications. Appeal was granted leave to consider questions on leave request for appeal. That the absorption / adjustment in any part of the Department or the Independent Department may or may not be entitled to the right in accordance with the Terms and Conditions of Service and the Service Tribunal may decide the matter with competence. Whether the Service Tribunal may, in accordance with the law of section 4 Service Tribunal Act 1973, exercise its jurisdiction in relation to the terms and conditions of the public servants, according to law. That the new Directorate had the prescribed qualification for the posts and whether the applicants stated that they had the required qualifications for absorption / adjustment against the posts in the Directorate and were entitled to be adjusted accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
