Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus MUKHTAR AHMAD

Article 12 (2) and AXLVII R 1 (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) aside the decision of the matter between the parties seeking the new facts till the dissent of the Supreme Court Petitioners. , Once again filed a petition under the CPC before the High Court on the ground that the claims filed in their petitions were based on false information and ignorance, which was dismissed. Out of these, the trial court adjourned the case and prosecuted it. His trial by the trial court was examined by the High Court as well as by the Supreme Court and the matter was eventually dismissed with the dismissal of the review petition, which led to the finalization of the Supreme Court decree. Format, which did not bother to request that the applicants were unaware of it. Certain facts may not be allowed for any litigant to plead his ignorance or lack of information to advance his case. False or false claims cannot be impacted. Judicial jurisdiction over the courts was granted by law. And they did not rely on the litigants / parties who stated the true facts in the claims, the best, as listed in OXLVII, R1 (c) CPC, the discovery of new and important matter or evidence. , Subject to the terms set out in the regulations, may provide a scope for review of the decree if the applicant's land If you were speaking will be no end to the litigation and any party disclosure of the facts and could start a new era through ignorance and lack. Slow down best advocate from Pindi gheb lawyer