SHAUKAT ALI versus DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER
Article 152 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Religious Seminary Candidate Eligibility Votes Vote The applicant was allowed to contest the election, despite objections to the educational ability of the applicant, and Was announced as a retired candidate but the Election Authority was instructed not to publish his result. The applicant had submitted that his religious madrassa's certificate was equivalent to matriculation certificate. Where the certificate was obtained from the applicant, it was not recognized as per the notification issued by the University Grants Commission from time to time, so the applicant was not matriculated so his educational qualification was required to participate in the election. Was not eligible for According to the provisions of section 152 (1) (e) of the Punjab Local Government, Extreme Ordinance, 2001, the respondent, who received the second highest number of votes, could not be declared a successful candidate because the applicant's disqualification was notorious. No votes Throw votes Tr's election would not apply because the entire constituency was declared a Supreme Court. The court directed the Election Commission to take steps to hold the latest elections for this seat, as per the law-based holiday. The appeal request for was rejected for terms r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Kot Bunglow lawyer