Find a Lawyer

KHUSHI MUHAMMAD versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION MAKHDOOM RASHID, MULTAN

Section 13/14/10 Motion Picture Ordinance (XLIII of 1979), Section 18 Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Constitution of Pakistan 292 (1973), Article 199 Termination of FIR on Constitutional Request Serious Commission of Adultery The charge was leveled against him. It was not denied by the defense counsel's arguments in or during the contents of the constitutional petition that the accused was caught red-handed with the accompanying accused in the commission of adultery with the girl. Which was a convincing crime, but only some of the Islamic teachings were taken to avoid punishment. The accused wanted to benefit from Surah Noor, verses 27 and 28, but failed to comply with Allah's intentions. Was. The official businessman involved in verses 29 and 30 was bound to examine the case presented by the bad characters before taking action against the accused; the true allegation was not forbidden. The accused did not say that he should be charged. The accused was utterly wrong and his motive was only to humiliate her. The accused in his house can prove his innocence in the case by examining the prosecution's testimony, and only the defense lawyer or his case-law statement cannot interfere in this case while reporting the current incident. The complainant and other witnesses did not comply, as he himself was obliged to comply with the rules of Islam prohibiting adultery, for looking at various injections or entering other homes. , Which is not only from God attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Noor kot lawyer