Article 5 and Schedule, 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Suit, dismissed the case for the recovery of the Dover Family Court that the Dover mentioned in the question was finalized in the Nakamata and the marriage between the parties. Even after the collapse of; the wife was not able to claim it unless the marriage was dissolved due to divorce or her death. The appellate court set aside the family court's findings, which are believed to have contracted a second marriage to her husband in violation of section 6 of the Muslim Family Law Ordinance. In 1961, the wife became entitled to recover Mukher Dover. Can't claim a valid dispute unless the death of either party does not dissolve the marriage or there is no power to dissolve because when arrogant or promptly postponed, it was an unnecessary right of the wife. And then, at any time, it becomes the right of the wife of the appellate court not to commit any illegal action or disorder by reversing the family court's findings on the matter. Defects in any jurisdiction have been found and the appellate court's findings have been retained and excluded, \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
