MST. SHAHNAZ MAI versus SUPERINTENDENT DAR-UL-AMAAN, MULTAN
Article 199 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 16 Constitutional petition Placing a woman in the capital against her will; Had to go because two people claiming to be his legally married wife, the applicant has admittedly entered into an independent, voluntary and voluntary agreement with her other husband when he married her ex-husband. After her divorce, she filed a lawsuit against the applicant. Refusing to deny divorce from her ex-husband, the parents filed a petition for marriage marital petitioner demanded in the present constitutional petition that his detention in Darul Aman was not accepted by her And she will enable it freely so that they can make it acceptable. Applicant to the lower courts in the High Court pursue civil and criminal proceedings before the hearing, arguing that he is not willing to stay in Darul Aman and care for minor life issues related to his marital life. Has been requested to do. Adult and elderly women who are capable of making decisions cannot be compelled to enter the Darul Aman for the indefinite period against their wishes in the Darul Aman to curtail their right to freedom. Because in view of the above circumstances an interlocutor was appointed at liberty to live the normal life of a free person.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Khanewal lawyer