MANAGER COLONY TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED, MULTAN versus PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAB LABOUR COURT NO.9 AND 2 OTHERS
Section 15 (2) and 17 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for payment of wages under the Payment of Wages Payment Act, 1936, after hearing the evidence, accepting the claim of the defendant Issued submission submission. After the fixed period Labor Court accepted the appeal against the authority order and gave the respondents the opportunity to appear in court and again gave the decision to the authority, the applicant (employer) ordered the labor court in a constitutional petition. Challenged before the High Court authority, the record of the case was not properly examined and the Labor Court passed the order in a slip manner, giving the respondents the opportunity to appear in the court authority as per the circumstances. Later, the authority was remanded from the facts so that the orders could be fully examined and the complaint lodged. Zalh be. The applicant of the workers failed to indicate any material irregularity or illegality. The responsibility of the appellate court in approving the unconstitutional order did not find any disobedience or misunderstanding in the unidentified order. Was granted to protect the interests of and the application of fair administration of justice was dismissed without any notice.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Balakot lawyer