HAJI versus STATE
Plaintiffs' inspection / accusation was emphasized in sections 340 (2) and 342 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 203DD and 203E that it responded to in its statement under section 342, CR PC That he was willing to examine himself on oath under section 4040 ((?), CCPC), but his evidence was not recorded nor was the trial court aware of such error. No explanation has been offered. Appellant did not confess to the crime and after saying that, he did not give her the right to testify on oath not to confirm it. Duty on the court Before Luna was put in place, the appellant should seek clarification to withdraw his position. Was taken, whose direction was issued. Examine the appellant about the oath, if he wishes, and if not, record his denial in writing.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from More kunda lawyer
