MUHAMMAD ARIF versus FARRUKH HAFEEZ
On the basis of its statements by the trial court, the referee's appointment suit by the parties for the specific performance of the sale agreement of Article 12 arbitration Act (X40 of 1940), section 24 statute evidence (10 of 1984) A decision was made in favor of. The referees appointed by the parties claimed that the referee's statement was not based on his personal information, but on his inquiries, he acted as mediator and not a referee Syed referee in his written submission. In the statement, it was mentioned that he was making statements based on his knowledge and some of the inquiries made by him also made the fact that the referee had inquired, would not deny his role as referee. And shall change it to the referee's statement pursuant to Article 32 of the EA. Testimony 1984 will serve as an acknowledgment of the plaintiff's claim by the plaintiff
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Gakhar Mandi lawyer
