Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM versus STATE

Sections 302 (b) and 302 (c) of the testimonial case were of two versions of the incident and the weapon used in the crime was admitted. The IR was ready. After consultation and deliberation, the probability of an incident that occurred long before the time mentioned by the prosecution could not be ruled out. At the trial, the cases recovered from the accused were not blood stains and there was evidence to recover. An appreciable value ocular account has already been denied by the trial court's four co-accused and cannot be relied upon in the presence of any strong independent confirmation piece of current evidence. To save her sister's honor, she suffered injuries as a result of intense and sudden outrage, it seems, is near. Defendant's evidence was also supported by the fact that under Section 230b (b), the culprits were convicted, and instead they were convicted under Section 2302 (c) PPC and the circumstances. I was sentenced to seven years. law firms from Swabi lawyer