Find a Lawyer

MUHABBAT ISLAM versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE/ JUSTICE OF PEACE

Sections 302/324/148/149/447/337A (ii) / 337F (v) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 22A & 22B Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for interference in judicial proceedings The Justice of the Trial Court was hearing in the trial court after issuing challan by the police, when the murder case was moved under Section 22A & 22B on the request of the accused, in connection with the PC Justice of Justice cross version. The Investigating Officer was given some instructions to conduct a detailed investigation. Through an illegal order, the Justice of Peace had earlier directed the police to record their cross-version and investigate the matter. The suspects were not satisfied with the outcome of the investigation, they could have transferred the higher authority to pass the investigation, but they had no right to remand to the trial court to record the cross-version after the Justice Trust. do. He had reviewed the case by issuing challan and appropriate orders could be approved in this case and during the course of the trial no one was sanctioned under Sections 22A and 5 22B, CRPC under Justice Peace. The verdict, which was an executive, is an interference in the judicial proceedings, which cannot be allowed to continue because the trial will never reach a logical end in a criminal case. As a result, the controversial order was set aside without any jurisdiction. The constitutional application was accepted under it. law firms from Kotla lawyer