Find a Lawyer

SHAHBAZ MASIH versus STATE

Section 497 (2) offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) ordinance (VII VI of 1979), section 10 bail, further investigation, the defendant's grant was Christian and it is yet to be seen whether the offense of adultery (enforced hood) was a section of the ordinance. The provisions of section 10, 1979 shall apply to it. Nor was there any four witnesses to be brought under the provisions of section 10 of the Penalty for Adultery (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979, and no DNA test was substituted for it. , Except that the affected woman, who is pregnant by her parents. How reliable the statement of the alleged victim can be, it would be a question of judicial inquiry, without DNA testing, which cannot be definitively stated who committed the crime. There was a four-month delay in filing the FIR. In all such cases, a further investigation was set up, the alleged victim did not complain against the accused for four months; a voluntary party case was expected against the accused on further investigation. Accepted on \ r \ n immigration advocates email from Sherani lawyer