Find a Lawyer

SHERAZ MEHMOOD versus STATE

Section 10 (3) definition of evidence was fully explained by the delay in filing the FIR, even otherwise the delay in filing the FIR had no basis for direct dismissal of the prosecution's case because in each case Depending on the facts and circumstances surrounding it, there is a delay in registering the case. Unless otherwise fully explained, the truth of the case will not be affected by the prosecution and the accused cannot be acquitted on the score. Both the courts have come to the conclusion that the accused raped the girl. Reese had committed. The courts also relied on the evidence of the accused along with the witness. The victim's statement, along with other controversial and circumstantial evidence, was accurate and natural, and there was no reason to deny the victim when she was seven-and-a-half years of age at the time of the commission of the crime and her statement before the court At the time of recording. At the age of 10, the Commission on the Incidence and Rape of Entry was also well received by the medical examiner's representative. The statement and statement of the lady doctor completely proved the contents of the medical report which was testified by the doctor. The giver was prepared by the medical report of the accused, indicating that at the time of the inspection the accused was strong and capable of interfering with the chemical examiner. Only the fact of the commission of rape was suspected, while it has been fully proven that the rape was committed with the deceased even in cases where the Chemical Examiner's report was negative. It was not enough to disperse the prosecution's affairs until the case was over immigration advocate from Burewala lawyer