Section 302/34 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), appealed against the four witnesses who failed to support the section 42 trial, which relied only on circumstantial evidence. And they were not connected in the same series to form a continuous stream. To the extent that the crime was committed by the accused, the evidence was not consistent with the defendant's innocence. The verdict relating to the crime did not suffer from any illegal proceedings, misrepresentation or reading of the evidence. The court should also consider the consequences of acquittal and avoid the restoration of evidence. The appeal against the defendants' verdict was dismissed in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
