Find a Lawyer

MASOOD HUSSAIN AND 2 OTHERS versus GHAZANFAR ALI

Appealing against the breach of section 307/34 evidence, the section & et al 15 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), was exaggerated and completed with material contradictions, by eyewitnesses. There was outrage, their free-forming was not available. The version of the injured witness directly contradicted the FIR and the recovery of the weapons of crime from the accused by the other material collected by the prosecution was not without any doubt, the prosecution said. The story could not have supported the recovery of fines by chance, the medical evidence alone could not be. Used as coherent evidence, because the wounds inflicted on the victim cannot speak against the person who caused the complainant's statements, and his brother's direct response to the prosecution's other witnesses There was a confrontation, including the injured witness, the court rightfully acquitted. According to the circumstances, the appeal against acquittal was dismissed law firms from Utror lawyer