THE STATE versus IRTIZA HUSSAIN JAFFERY
Section 497 (5) Crimes Against Azad Jammu and Kashmir Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, Section 14 Punitive Regulation (XLV of 1860), Section 430A / 435/436/457/511 Bail, Imperial Approved by the Shariat Court The cancellation of the order did not disclose the bail allowed to the accused, out of the six cases in which the bail was allowed, the reasons for the bail were not given, and in these six cases only one application was moved for bail. Which was accepted without mentioning the facts and without arguing. The principles that guaranteed the merits of each case were not upheld, given the fact that a separate application was required for each case to exclude the application, the defendant being charged per second for the separation of facts and circumstances. The whole ideology of the age of There was no reasonable basis for the grant of bail in the case;
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Hangu lawyer
