Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

KHADIM MUHAMMAD versus TILLA MUHAMMAD


The Section 115 Special Relief Act (of 1877), the Section 42 suit for declaring jurisdiction, was based on an examination of the facts recorded by the trial court and an accurate and careful assessment of the evidence obtained by the Court of Appeal. And the basis on which the emphasis was put was to make a decisive decision. Along with the trial courts, the appellate court discussed every aspect of the case and dealt with the matter in detail, leaving no room for further consideration of the case, while rejecting the claims of the plaintiffs due to lack of evidence. Neither evidence has been falsified or excluded. The record of any evidence should not be considered on the record nor should the definition of evidence be deemed misleading to warrant the intervention of the High Court under Section 115, CPC.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Malakand lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.