Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAKEELA versus STATE

Section 9 was sent thirteen days after the forensic science laboratory was sent, and no plausible explanation for the delay was found contradicting the material contention in the statements of two minor witnesses in the restoration memo. A prosecutor's witness said the lady constable was not with the police party at the police station and was later summoned by the investigating officer, while another witness stated in her statement that she had managed the lady constables. And then the "masked" FLR reported that the witness had also told that the lady constable accompanied him to the scene from the police station. Such contradictions could not be reconciled. The best evidence was withheld by the prosecutor for no apparent reason, because there were contradictions between the statements of the prosecutor's witnesses, the prohibition was sent to Franzek, the science laboratory at a very deserted stage, and the best evidence. Was stopped by the prosecution, the appeal against the conviction and sentence of the accused was accepted and the trial court's affidavit was set aside and the accused was acquitted and released from jail. \ R \ n \ r \ n immigration advocates email from Shorkot lawyer