Find a Lawyer

SAYED HAMIM SHAH versus MST. SABIHA

Section 5 and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Family Court reduced the suit by the appellate court and the defendant's monthly income was very modest and did not pay such restitution. Could do The defendant's legitimate duty was to bring evidence in support of a request that nothing was in the record to indicate what income he received from the shop through the defendant, where he was under constitutional jurisdiction. While serving in the High Court, I could not correct the facts of the compilation. The appropriate remedy provided under the law by appeal to the subordinate courts during the proceedings of the family matter has already been obtained by the defendant where the law does not provide further treatment to the affected party, then the final decision should be attached to a decision. The court will not substitute its findings in the event of a dispute decision or the exercise of another high constitutional jurisdiction, if the second opinion is to reuse oil, the High Court rejects the constitutional application. top advocate from Nilam lawyer