Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus ABDUL WAKEEL

RS, 516A and 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 406, 419, 420, 468, 471 and 381 Superior Order Cushing Applicants, who claimed to have purchased a motor car in question, rented one person. And said that the person had sold the same through forgery. The respondent had filed an FIR at the police station under Sections 406, 419, 420, 468, 471 and 381, PPC and. Police recovered the car from the applicant The applicants and the respondents filed a petition for a car grant in the Superior Appellate Court, in review, the applicant's request was rejected and the respondent's request was accepted and the car's superintendent answered The petitioner was granted, the petitioner filed an application under section 561A for the car-related appellate court civil suit ruling is pending in the court, the magistrate and the appellate court asked the applicant. Invalid premises were processed in decline. In view of the material and report on the applicant's record to the police on the applicant's request and to hand over the respondent, the scales were certainly leaning in favor of the applicant and the High Court in question. The accepted request was rejected. An unclean order along this direction registration advocate from Kotri lawyer